Skip to main content

WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Feb 26, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed Feb 26, 2024

WTM$2,256.20+0.7%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

HG Global/BAM

The HG Global/BAM segment consists of the consolidated results of HG Global, HG Re and BAM. BAM is the first and only mutual municipal bond insurance company in the United States. By insuring the timely payment of principal and interest on municipal bonds, BAM provides market access to, and lowers interest expense for, issuers of municipal bonds used to finance essential public purpose projects. BAM is domiciled in New York and is owned by and operated for the benefit of its policyholders, the municipalities that purchase BAM’s insurance for their debt issuances. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) require White Mountains to consolidate BAM’s results in its financial statements, which are attributed to noncontrolling interests. BAM reports on a statutory accounting basis to the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) and does not report stand-alone GAAP financial results.

HG Global was established to fund the startup of BAM and, through HG Re, to provide up to 15%-of-par, first loss reinsurance protection for policies underwritten by BAM. HG Global and HG Re are domiciled in Bermuda. At inception in 2012, HG Global was capitalized with $609 million. HG Global, together with its subsidiaries, funded the initial capitalization of BAM through the purchase of $503 million of surplus notes issued by BAM (the “BAM Surplus Notes”). See“CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES — Surplus Notes Valuation — BAM Surplus Notes” on page 78 for a discussion on the accounting and risks associated with the BAM Surplus Notes. BAM launched in 2012 after securing its “AA/stable” rating from Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“Standard & Poor’s”). In July 2023, Standard & Poor’s affirmed BAM’s “AA/stable” rating. “AA” is the third highest of 23 financial strength ratings assigned by Standard & Poor’s.

BAM charges an insurance premium on each municipal bond insurance policy it underwrites. A portion of the premium is a member’s surplus contribution (“MSC”) and the remainder is a risk premium. In the event of a municipal bond refunding, a portion of the MSC from original issuance can be reutilized, in effect serving as a credit against the total insurance premium on the refunding of the municipal bond. Issuers of debt insured by BAM are members of BAM so long as any of their BAM-insured debt is outstanding. As members, they have certain interests in BAM, including the right to vote for BAM’s directors and to receive dividends, if declared.

BAM focuses on municipal bonds issued to finance essential public purpose projects, such as schools, utilities and transportation facilities. BAM focuses on small-to-medium sized investment grade municipal bonds, primarily in the AA, A and BBB categories. BAM seeks to build a relatively low risk insurance portfolio with prudent single risk limits. White Mountains believes that municipal bonds insured by BAM have strong appeal to retail investors, who buy smaller, less liquid issues, have less portfolio diversification and have fewer credit differentiation skills and analytical resources than institutional investors.

BAM is exposed to climate-related events to the extent that those events impact a municipal issuer’s ability to service its debt obligations. BAM incorporates climate change risk in its credit underwriting process. In doing so, BAM considers both the short-term economic impact from climate change-related severe weather events (including flooding, wildfires, and drought) as well as longer-term impacts on population and property values from rising sea levels and changing temperature patterns.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, White Mountains reported $1,221 million and $1,125 million of total assets and $376 million and $364 million of total equity related to HG Global. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, White Mountains owned 96.9% of HG Global’s preferred equity and 88.4% of its common equity. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, White Mountains reported $1 million and $(1) million of noncontrolling interests related to HG Global.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, White Mountains reported $530 million and $507 million of total assets and $(140) million and $(155) million of noncontrolling interests related to BAM.

Reinsurance Treaties

FLRT

BAM is a party to a first loss reinsurance treaty (“FLRT”) with HG Re under which HG Re provides first loss protection up to 15%-of-par outstanding on each municipal bond insured by BAM. For capital appreciation bonds, par is adjusted to the estimated equivalent par value for current interest paying bonds. In return, BAM cedes approximately 60% of the risk premium charged for insuring the municipal bond, which is net of a ceding commission.

The FLRT is a perpetual agreement with terms that can be renegotiated after a specified period of time. During 2021, BAM and HG Re agreed that the terms may be renegotiated at the end of 2024, and each subsequent five-year period thereafter.

If the parties are unable to mutually agree to amended terms, the dispute is resolved through arbitration, according to certain principles agreed to by the parties. Amended contract terms must be approved by the NYDFS. Should BAM consider the amended terms unacceptable, it has the option to purchase HG Re or cause another reinsurer to purchase HG Re, at fair value.

Pursuant to the FLRT, BAM’s underwriting guidelines may only be amended with the consent of HG Re. In addition, HG Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of HG Global, has the right to designate two directors for election to BAM’s board of directors.

Fidus Re

BAM is party to a collateralized excess of loss reinsurance agreement that serves to increase BAM’s claims paying resources and is provided by Fidus Re, Ltd. (“Fidus Re”), a Bermuda based special purpose insurer created in 2018 solely to provide reinsurance protection to BAM.

Fidus Re was initially capitalized in 2018 via the issuance of $100 million of insurance linked securities (the “Fidus Re 2018 Agreement”). The proceeds from issuance were placed in a collateral trust supporting Fidus Re’s obligations to BAM. The insurance linked securities were issued with an initial term of 12 years and are callable five years after the date of issuance. Under the Fidus Re 2018 Agreement, Fidus Re reinsures 90% of aggregate losses exceeding $165 million on a portion of BAM’s financial guarantee portfolio (the “2018 Covered Portfolio”) up to a total reimbursement of $100 million. The Fidus Re 2018 Agreement does not provide coverage for losses in excess of $276 million. The 2018 Covered Portfolio consists of approximately 23% of BAM’s gross par outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

In 2021, Fidus Re issued an additional $150 million of insurance linked securities (the “Fidus Re 2021 Agreement”), which have an initial term of 12 years and are callable five years after the date of issuance. The proceeds from issuance were placed in a collateral trust supporting Fidus Re’s obligations to BAM. Under the Fidus Re 2021 Agreement, Fidus Re reinsures 90% of aggregate losses exceeding $135 million on a portion of BAM’s financial guarantee portfolio (the “2021 Covered Portfolio”) up to a total reimbursement of $150 million. The Fidus Re 2021 Agreement does not provide coverage for losses in excess of $302 million. The 2021 Covered Portfolio consists of approximately 27% of BAM’s gross par outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

In 2022, Fidus Re issued an additional $150 million of insurance linked securities (the “Fidus Re 2022 Agreement”), which have an initial term of 12 years and are callable seven years after the date of issuance. The proceeds from issuance were placed in a collateral trust supporting Fidus Re’s obligations to BAM. Under the Fidus Re 2022 Agreement, Fidus Re reinsures 90% of aggregate losses exceeding $110 million on a portion of BAM’s financial guarantee portfolio (the “2022 Covered Portfolio”) up to a total reimbursement of $150 million. The Fidus Re 2022 Agreement does not provide coverage for losses in excess of $277 million. The 2022 Covered Portfolio consists of approximately 29% of BAM’s gross par outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

XOLT

In 2020, BAM entered into an excess of loss reinsurance agreement (the “XOLT”) with HG Re. Under the XOLT, HG Re provides last dollar protection for exposures on municipal bonds insured by BAM in excess of NYDFS single issuer limits. The XOLT is subject to an aggregate limit equal to the lesser of $125 million or the assets held in the Supplemental Trust at any point in time. Cessions under the XOLT are subject to approval by HG Re. As of December 31, 2023, BAM had ceded $465 million of exposure to HG Re under the XOLT.

Collateral Trusts

HG Re’s obligations under the FLRT are subject to an aggregate limit equal to the assets in two collateral trusts: a Regulation 114 Trust and a supplemental collateral trust (the “Supplemental Trust” and, together with the Regulation 114 Trust, the “Collateral Trusts”) at any point in time.

On a monthly basis, BAM deposits cash equal to ceded premiums, net of ceding commissions, due to HG Re under the FLRT directly into the Regulation 114 Trust. The Regulation 114 Trust target balance is equal to HG Re’s unearned premiums and unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense (“LAE”) reserves, if any. If, at the end of any quarter, the Regulation 114 Trust balance is below the target balance, funds will be withdrawn from the Supplemental Trust and deposited into the Regulation 114 Trust in an amount equal to the shortfall. If, at the end of any quarter, the Regulation 114 Trust balance is above 102% of the target balance, funds will be withdrawn from the Regulation 114 Trust and deposited into the Supplemental Trust. The Regulation 114 Trust balance as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $342 million and $289 million.

The Supplemental Trust target balance is $603 million, less the amount of cash and securities in the Regulation 114 Trust in excess of its target balance (the “Supplemental Trust Target Balance”). If, at the end of any quarter, the Supplemental Trust balance exceeds the Supplemental Trust Target Balance, such excess may be distributed to HG Re. The distribution will be made first as an assignment of accrued interest on the BAM Surplus Notes and second in cash and/or fixed income securities. As the BAM Surplus Notes are repaid over time, the BAM Surplus Notes will be replaced in the Supplemental Trust by cash and fixed income securities. The Supplemental Trust balance as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $607 million and $568 million, which included $247 million and $214 million of cash, investments and accrued investment income, $322 million and $340 million of BAM Surplus Notes and $38 million and $14 million of interest receivable on the BAM Surplus Notes.

If, at any point in time, the sum of the Regulation 114 Trust balance and the Supplemental Trust balance equals zero, BAM may choose to terminate the FLRT on a runoff basis. However, HG Re can elect to continue the FLRT by depositing into the Regulation 114 Trust assets with a fair market value not less than the greater of (i) $100 million or (ii) 10% of the then Regulation 114 Trust target balance.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Collateral Trusts held assets of $949 million and $857 million, which included $589 million and $503 million of cash, investments and accrued investment income, $322 million and $340 million of BAM Surplus Notes and $38 million and $14 million of interest receivable on the BAM Surplus Notes.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, total interest receivable on the BAM Surplus Notes was $175 million and $158 million, which includes amounts held outside the Collateral Trusts.

Competition/Pricing

The municipal bond insurance industry is highly competitive. BAM’s primary competitor is Assured Guaranty Ltd. (“Assured”).

BAM and Assured each seeks to differentiate itself through financial strength ratings, claims paying resources and underwriting strategies. BAM believes it has a number of distinct competitive advantages. BAM’s insured portfolio consists only of essential public purpose U.S. municipal bonds, and it has no exposure to mortgage and asset-backed securities, derivatives, non-U.S. structured or sovereign credits or territorial credits, such as Puerto Rico. BAM believes that, over time, its mutual structure will deliver a cost of capital advantage relative to its stock company competitors.

BAM seeks to provide transparency with respect to its insured portfolio and each insured issuer. In order to allow issuers and investors in BAM-insured municipal bonds to monitor financial strength first-hand, BAM publishes credit profiles on every insured issuer. Credit profiles are accessible by CUSIP, obligor, state or sector on BAM’s website.

Pricing (i.e., premium level) is affected by a number of factors, including interest rate levels, credit spreads, trading value, and capture rate (i.e., the percentage of total interest savings captured in the form of insurance premium). All else being equal, pricing is generally higher when interest rates are higher, credit spreads are wider, BAM’s trading value is higher relative to competitors and the capture rate is higher.

Insured Portfolio

The following table presents BAM’s insured portfolio by asset class as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

MillionsDecember 31, 2023December 31, 2022
SectorGross Par OutstandingWeighted Average Standard & Poor’s Credit Rating (1)Gross Par OutstandingWeighted Average Standard & Poor’s Credit Rating (1)
General Obligation$60,471.7A$55,955.0A
Utility14,629.0A13,583.3A
Dedicated Tax12,040.2A+10,755.0A
General Fund8,842.1A+8,218.7A+
Higher Education7,444.8A-6,947.5A-
Enterprise Systems6,245.9A4,537.4A
Total insured portfolio$109,673.7A$99,996.9A

(1) The weighted average credit ratings are based on Standard & Poor’s credit ratings, or if unrated by Standard & Poor’s, the Standard & Poor’s equivalent of credit ratings provided by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”).

The following tables present BAM’s ten largest direct exposures based upon gross par outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

December 31, 2023
$ in MillionsGross Par Outstanding (2)Percent of Total Gross Par Outstanding (2)Standard & Poor’s Credit Rating (1)
Midway Airport, City of Chicago, IL (Cook County), Airport GARBs (2023 Supplemental Indenture)$513.50.5%A
City of Chicago, IL (Cook County), Sales Tax - Local477.70.4AA-
South Carolina Public Service Authority441.40.4A-
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, PA, Toll Roads438.00.4A+
Chicago Transit Authority, IL435.90.4AA-
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, System & Program Bonds, NJ, Gas Tax (2)432.10.4A-
Port Authority of NY and NJ418.50.4AA-
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL (Cook County)395.50.4A
State of Connecticut, CT (Lottery Revenue)380.90.3AA-
Clark County SD, NV (Clark County)376.30.3AA-
Total of top ten exposures$4,309.83.9%

(1)“AA-” is the fourth highest, “A+” is the fifth highest, “A” is the sixth highest and “A-” is the seventh highest of 23 credit ratings assigned by Standard & Poor’s.

(2)For capital appreciation bonds, the amounts shown equal the estimated equivalent par value had the bonds been current interest paying bonds.

December 31, 2022
$ in MillionsGross Par Outstanding (2)Percent of Total Gross Par Outstanding (2)Standard & Poor’s Credit Rating (1)
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, PA, Toll Roads$441.30.4%A
City of Chicago, IL (Cook County), Sales Tax - Local409.00.4AA-
Clark County SD, NV (Clark County)383.10.4A+
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, System & Program Bonds, NJ, Gas Tax (2)375.90.4BBB+
State of Illinois369.80.4BBB+
Miami-Dade County School Board (Miami-Dade County)366.80.4AA-
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL (Cook County)366.30.4A-
South Carolina Public Service Authority366.00.4A-
Sacramento City USD, CA (Sacramento County)349.40.3BBB
Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA), NY, Mass Transit - Farebox (2)346.90.3BBB+
Total of top ten exposures$3,774.53.8%

(1)“AA-” is the fourth highest, “A+” is the fifth highest, “A” is the sixth highest, “A-” is the seventh highest, “BBB+” is the eighth highest and “BBB” is the ninth highest of 23 credit ratings assigned by Standard & Poor’s.

(2)For capital appreciation bonds, the amounts shown equal the estimated equivalent par value had the bonds been current interest paying bonds.

The following tables present the geographic distribution of BAM’s insured portfolio as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

$ in MillionsNumber of RisksGross Par OutstandingPercent of Total Gross Par Outstanding
California862$21,146.019.3%
Texas1,05716,338.614.9
Pennsylvania54310,946.110.0
Illinois48710,212.19.3
New York4175,606.35.1
New Jersey2104,478.74.1
Florida923,515.03.2
Alabama2123,265.13.0
Ohio1913,110.32.8
Michigan1782,448.52.2
Other States1,51728,607.026.1
Total insured portfolio5,766$109,673.7100.0%
$ in MillionsNumber of RisksGross Par OutstandingPercent of Total Gross Par Outstanding
California824$20,055.520.1%
Texas97613,615.413.6
Pennsylvania53510,880.210.9
Illinois4679,065.99.1
New York4135,822.45.8
New Jersey1974,195.84.2
Florida833,184.13.2
Alabama2063,172.73.2
Ohio1812,844.52.8
Michigan1632,342.42.3
Other States1,37424,818.024.8
Total insured portfolio5,419$99,996.9100.0%

The following table presents BAM’s insured portfolio by issuer size of exposure as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

$ in MillionsDecember 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Original Par Amount Per Issuer (1)Number of RisksGross Par OutstandingPercent of Total Gross Par OutstandingNumber of RisksGross Par OutstandingPercent of Total Gross Par Outstanding
Less than $10 million2,915$10,950.710.0%2,822$10,937.110.9%
$10 to $50 million2,24340,079.836.52,07438,372.238.4
$50 to $100 million37620,874.319.033219,090.319.1
$100 to $200 million15617,878.516.312414,596.814.6
$200 to $300 million428,437.97.7387,747.17.7
$300 to $400 million257,874.27.2257,855.77.9
$400 to $500 million83,064.82.841,397.71.4
$500 to $600 million1513.50.5———
Total insured portfolio5,766$109,673.7100.0%5,419$99,996.9100.0%

(1)The original par amount per issuer does not include refunded and re-issued deals.

Insured Credit Surveillance

BAM management maintains a surveillance committee that evaluates the credit profile of each insured municipal bond on a periodic basis. The surveillance committee places each insured municipal bond into one of four surveillance categories, the last two of which represent insured municipal bonds that are on BAM’s insured credit watchlist. Surveillance category 3 represents insured municipal bonds whose issuers are experiencing financial, legal or administrative issues causing overall credit quality deterioration, but whose probability of generating an insured loss is considered remote. Surveillance category 4 represents insured municipal bonds where a loss is expected or losses have been paid and have not been recovered or are not recoverable. As of December 31, 2023, BAM had assigned one credit to surveillance category 3 and did not assign any credits to surveillance category 4.

Insured municipal bonds on the watchlist are monitored closely and are subject to BAM’s distressed credit management procedures, including a remediation plan developed in consultation with BAM’s legal counsel and consultants. The objectives of any remediation plan are to address the problems the issuer is facing, to address any external factors impacting the credit, to ensure that creditors’ rights are enforced and to cure any breaches that may have occurred with respect to any credit triggers or covenants. BAM may work with other insurers, municipal bondholders and/or interested parties on remediation efforts, as applicable.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.