Skip to main content

REGIS CORP

For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Sep 3, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Sep 3, 2025

RGS$23.70-0.0%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Regis Corporation

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Regis Corporation (a Minnesota corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Realizability of deferred tax assets

As described further in Note 1 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognized a change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $116.3 million during the year ended June 30, 2025 primarily related to a partial release of its valuation allowance. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance, if based on the weight of all available evidence, in management’s judgment it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. During the year ended June 30, 2025, the Company released $116.3 million of its previously recorded valuation allowance. The Company considered the achievement three years of cumulative income as well as forecasted income to be significant positive evidence. The Company determined that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence and supported a partial release of the valuation allowance. We identified the release of a portion of the Company’s valuation allowance as a critical audit matter.

The principal consideration for our determination that the partial release of its valuation allowance is a critical audit matter is that auditing management’s assessment of the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets involved complex judgments due to the significant assumptions required in measuring the future utilization of deferred tax assets.

Our audit procedures related to the partial release of the valuation allowance included the following, among others.

We analyzed the significant assumptions used by management, including forecasted revenue and forecasted income to (1) historical results, and (2) current industry trends and evaluated whether economic trends and other factors support the significant assumptions.

We evaluated management’s historical ability to forecast income.

We evaluated whether the estimates of forecasted income were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

With the assistance of professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, we evaluated (1) the application of tax laws in the Company’s scheduling of the release of existing taxable temporary differences and carryforward amounts, and (2) the ability to utilize the deferred tax assets.

Goodwill Quantitative Impairment Assessment – Franchise Reporting Unit

As described further in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance attributable to their Franchise reporting unit was $173.2 million as of June 30, 2025. Management performed the Company’s annual quantitative impairment assessment for the Franchise reporting unit as of April 30, 2025, to test goodwill for impairment. As a result of the assessment performed, the Company determined that the fair value of the Franchise reporting unit was more likely than not greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit as of April 30, 2025. We identified the goodwill quantitative impairment assessment of the Franchise reporting unit as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that the goodwill quantitative impairment assessment of the Franchise reporting unit is a critical audit matter are that subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate: (1) the assumptions used by management engaged professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, including the accuracy of data provided to management’s specialist to determine the fair value; and (2) the assumptions used by management to calculate the undiscounted cash flows, including assumptions of franchisee store openings and closures.

Our audit procedures related to the annual goodwill quantitative impairment assessment of the Franchise reporting unit included the following, among others.

We analyzed the significant assumptions used by management, including forecasted revenue and forecasted income to (1) historical results, and (2) current industry trends and evaluated whether economic trends and other factors support the significant assumptions.

We evaluated management’s historical ability to forecast income.

We evaluated whether the estimates of forecasted income were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

With the assistance of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge, we tested management’s process for calculating the goodwill impairment assessment, including the reasonableness of the valuation methodology and certain significant assumptions used in the calculations including the discount rate applied to the estimated future cash flows.

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

September 3, 2025

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.