Skip to main content

PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025

PNC$231.300.0%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Key Macroeconomic Variables in CECL Weighted-Average Scenarios

We used a number of economic variables in our scenarios, with two of the most significant drivers being real GDP and the U.S. unemployment rate. The following table presents a comparison of these two economic variables based on the weighted-average scenario forecasts used in determining our ACL at December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Table 42: Key Macroeconomic Variables in CECL Weighted-Average Scenarios

Assumptions as of December 31, 2024
202520262027
U.S. real GDP (a)0.7%2.2%2.2%
U.S. Unemployment Rate (b)4.8%4.7%4.4%
Assumptions as of December 31, 2023
202420252026
U.S. real GDP (a)0.1%1.5%2.0%
U.S. Unemployment Rate (c)4.5%4.6%4.2%

(a)Represents year-over-year growth rates.

(b)Represents quarterly average rate at December 31, 2025, 2026 and 2027, respectively.

(c)Represents quarterly average rate at December 31, 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively.

Real GDP growth is expected to slow by the end of 2025 to 0.7% on a weighted average basis, down from the 1.5% assumed at December 31, 2023. Growth then rebounds to 2.2% where real GDP remains stable through 2026 and 2027. The weighted-average unemployment rate is expected to end 2025 at 4.8%, peaking at 4.9% in 2026 before decreasing to 4.4% by the fourth quarter of 2027.

To provide additional context regarding the sensitivity of the ACL to a more pessimistic forecast of expected economic outcomes, we considered what our ACL would be when applying a 100% probability weighting to the most severe downside CECL scenario. This severe downside scenario estimated that real GDP contracted in 2025 ending the year down 2.5% compared to 2024 levels, with growth picking up again by the end of 2026. The unemployment rate in this scenario increased to end 2025 at 6.6%, then peaks at 7.1% in 2026, before gradually improving to 6.1% by the end of 2027. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our ACL of $2.3 billion at December 31, 2024. This scenario does not reflect our current expectation at December 31, 2024, nor does it capture all the potential unknown variables that could arise in the forecast period, but it provides an approximation of a possible outcome under hypothetical severe conditions. The CECL methodology inherently requires a high degree of judgment, and as a result, it is possible that we may, at another point in time, reach different conclusions regarding our credit loss estimates.

Qualitative Component

As discussed in the Allowance for Credit Losses section of Note 1 Accounting Policies, we incorporate qualitative reserves in the ACL that reflect our best estimate of expected losses that may not be adequately represented in our quantitative methods or economic assumptions. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, inherent forecasting limitations, model imprecision, timing of available information, and/or emerging and ongoing credit risks. At December 31, 2024, the qualitative framework considers PNC’s

84 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. –2024 Form 10-K view of the current state of the economy, which continues to reflect uncertainty due to the fundamental change in office demand from the acceptance of remote work, inflationary pressures, interest rate movements and housing affordability. Our most significant qualitative factor was related to the office portfolio of the commercial real estate loan class.

We believe the economic scenarios effectively reflect the distribution of potential economic outcomes. Additionally, through in-depth and granular analysis we have addressed reserve requirements for the specific populations most affected in the current environment. Through this approach, we believe the reserve levels appropriately reflect the expected credit losses in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date.

See the following for additional details on the components of our ACL:

Allowance for Credit Losses in the Credit Risk Management section of this Item 7, and

Note 1 Accounting Policies, Note 2 Investment Securities, and Note 3 Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses.

Residential and Commercial Mortgage Servicing Rights

We elect to measure our MSRs at fair value. This election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets. The fair value of our MSRs is estimated by using a discounted cash flow valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other factors which are determined based on current market conditions.

We employ risk management strategies designed to protect the value of MSRs from changes in interest rates and related market factors. The values of the MSRs are economically hedged with securities and derivatives, including interest-rate swaps, options, and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts. As interest rates change, these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value inverse to the change in fair value of the hedged MSR portfolios. The hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the MSRs. Selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial MSRs requires significant management judgment to assess how rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of MSRs. Hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term, but over longer periods of time, they are expected to protect the economic value of the MSRs.

For information on how each estimate has changed and a sensitivity analysis of the hypothetical effect of the fair value of MSRs to immediate adverse changes in key assumptions, see Note 5 Goodwill and Mortgage Servicing Rights. For additional information on our residential and commercial MSRs, see Note 1 Accounting Policies, Note 5 Goodwill and Mortgage Servicing Rights and Note 14 Fair Value.

Fair Value Measurements - Level 3

We must use estimates, assumptions and judgments when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. When observable price and third-party information is not available, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other financial modeling techniques. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these valuation techniques could materially impact our future financial condition and results of operations.

We apply ASC 820 –Fair Value Measurements. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell a financial asset or paid to transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This guidance requires a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used in the measurement are observable or unobservable. Level 3 assets and liabilities are those where the fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs. An asset or liability’s classification as Level 2 or Level 3 is based upon the specific facts and circumstances associated with each instrument, and management applies judgment regarding the significance of unobservable inputs to each asset or liability when determining its fair value level classification. In addition to MSRs, certain of our private equity investments and available-for-sale securities have a high level of estimation uncertainty and require significant management judgment to determine the fair value. While estimating potential sensitivities around fair value measurements is inherently challenging, we provide a summary of the key unobservable inputs as well as additional information on Level 3 fair value measurements in Note 14 Fair Value.

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. –2024 Form 10-K 85

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards UpdateDescriptionFinancial Statement Impact
Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures - ASU 2023-09Issued December 2023• Required with issuance of 2025 Form 10-K; early adoption is permitted.• Requires public business entities to, on an annual basis, (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold.• Requires that all entities disclose, on an annual basis, (1) the amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received), disaggregated by federal (national), state and foreign taxes, and (2) the amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received), disaggregated by individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid (net of refunds received) is equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received).• Allows for either a prospective or retrospective transition approach.• We are currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of this ASU and do not plan to early adopt.• This ASU will not impact our Consolidated Income Statement, Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.• We expect to provide additional disaggregated income tax disclosures in accordance with this ASU.
Accounting Standards UpdateDescriptionFinancial Statement Impact
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses - ASU 2024-03Issued November 2024• Required with issuance of 2027 Form 10-K; early adoption is permitted.• Requires public business entities to disclose, in the notes to financial statements and on an annual and interim basis, specified information about certain costs and expenses (including, if relevant: inventory purchases, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation from oil and gas-producing activities).• Requires qualitative descriptions of amounts not separately disaggregated to be disclosed.• Requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses.• Allows for either a prospective or retrospective transition approach.• We are currently evaluating the disclosure requirements within this ASU and do not plan to early adopt.• This ASU will not impact our Consolidated Income Statement, Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.• We expect to provide additional disaggregated income statement expense disclosures in accordance with this ASU.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 Accounting Policies regarding the impact of new accounting pronouncements that we have adopted.

86 The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. –2024 Form 10-K

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.