TEAM INC

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Team, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Team, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Sufficiency of audit evidence over revenue

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, and as presented in the consolidated statement of operations, the Company reported revenue of $896,483 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2025. As discussed in Note 1, the Company recognizes revenue as (or when) the performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control over a service or product to the customer. Most of the Company’s performance obligations qualify for recognition over time, and they are generally able to elect the right-to-invoice practical expedient, which permits them to recognize revenue in the amount to which they have a right to invoice the customer.

We identified the evaluation of sufficiency of audit evidence over revenue as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to determine the nature and extent of procedures to perform over revenue related to the transfer of control to the customer and the Company’s right to invoice the customer.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We applied auditor judgment to determine the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over revenue. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the revenue process. We performed a software-assisted data analysis to test relationships among certain revenue transactions. For a sample of transactions, we compared the amounts recognized as revenue for consistency with relevant underlying documentation, including contracts and other third-party evidence. We evaluated the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained over revenue by assessing the results of the procedures performed, including the appropriateness of the nature and extent of such evidence.

Accounting for warrants issued in 2025

As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, on September 11, 2025, in connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company issued warrants to purchase 982,371 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $23.00 per share (Tranche A) and 470,889 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $50.00 per share (Tranche B). The Company determined that the warrants meet the criteria for equity classification and were, therefore, recorded in Additional Paid-In-Capital at their estimated fair value of $20.9 million.

We identified the assessment of the accounting for the Tranche A and Tranche B warrants to purchase common stock as a critical audit matter. Specifically, subjective auditor judgment was required to assess the classification of the warrants as liabilities or equity because of the complexity of the warrant terms and the interpretation of the relevant accounting guidance.

The following is the primary procedure we performed to address the critical audit matter. We assessed management’s interpretation and application of the relevant accounting guidance to determine whether the warrants were appropriately classified as liabilities or equity by examining the terms and conditions included within the warrant agreements.

/s/KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

Houston, Texas

March 12, 2026