Skip to main content

UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 11, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Mar 11, 2025

UEIC$5.39-8.6%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Universal Electronics Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Universal Electronics Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"), and our report dated March 11, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Revenue recognition - Determination of over time versus point in time revenue recognition

As described further in Note 2 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, product revenue is generated through manufacturing and delivering home entertainment control products, climate control solutions, wireless sensor and smart home control products and and audio-video accessories. The Company recognizes revenue over time when performance creates an asset with no alternative use (custom products) and when the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, including a reasonable margin, through a contractual commitment from the customer. Revenue is recognized at a point in time if the criteria for recognizing revenue over time are not met. For each new product and/or contract, management performs an analysis to determine whether the asset created is a product with no alternative use and whether the terms and conditions of the contract indicate the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, including a reasonable margin. We identified the determination of over time versus point in time revenue recognition as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that over time versus point in time revenue recognition is a critical audit matter is the significant judgment exercised by management in identifying and evaluating whether new products and/or contracts meet the criteria for over time or point in time revenue recognition. Significant judgments include the evaluation of whether it is possible, contractually or economically, to repurpose or redirect products for an alternative use, as well as the evaluation of contractual legal terms and rights within each jurisdiction in which the Company operates.

Our audit procedures related to the over time versus point in time revenue recognition included the following, among others:

We tested the design and operating effectiveness of key controls associated with the Company's classification of new products, including those associated with the determination and classification of a product as having no alternative use.

We tested the design and operating effectiveness of key controls over the Company's new and amended contract review process, specifically those related to the identification and evaluation of terms and conditions associated with an enforceable right to payment, including a reasonable margin.

For a selection of products from the Company's active products listing, we performed testing to determine whether products identified as having no alternative use are restricted, either contractually or economically, to be repurposed or redirected. This includes evaluating management judgments regarding the economic feasibility of repurposing a finished product and evidence to support that the final product has no alternative use.

For a selection of products, we traced the products into the Company's listing of active products and determined whether that product was appropriately classified as having no alternative use or not. For transactions selected with no alternative use, we also obtained and read the contract to determine whether the contract terms specifically identified an enforceable right to payment, including a reasonable margin, for performance completed to date. The two parts to this test serve to determine whether the revenue was appropriately recorded over time or at a point in time.

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.

Phoenix, Arizona

March 11, 2025

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.