ALABAMA POWER CO

Rate Structure and Cost Recovery Plans

The rates and service regulations of the traditional electric operating companies are uniform for each class of service throughout their respective retail service territories. Rates for residential electric service are generally of the block type based upon KWHs used and include minimum charges. Residential and other rates contain separate customer charges. Rates for commercial service are also of the block type and, for large customers, the billing demand is generally used to determine capacity and minimum bill charges. These large customers' rates are generally based upon usage by the customer and include rates with special features to encourage off-peak usage. Additionally, Alabama Power and Mississippi Power are generally allowed by their respective state PSCs to negotiate the terms and cost of service to large customers, subject to final state PSC approval.

The traditional electric operating companies recover certain costs through a variety of forward-looking, cost-based rate mechanisms. Fuel and net purchased energy costs are recovered through specific fuel cost recovery provisions. These fuel cost recovery provisions are adjusted to reflect increases or decreases in such costs as needed or on schedules as required by the respective PSCs. Approved compliance, storm damage, and certain other costs are recovered at Alabama Power and Mississippi Power through specific cost recovery mechanisms approved by their respective PSCs. Certain similar costs at Georgia Power are recovered through various base rate tariffs as approved by the Georgia PSC. Costs not recovered through specific cost recovery mechanisms are recovered at Alabama Power and Mississippi Power through annual, formulaic cost recovery proceedings and at Georgia Power through periodic base rate proceedings.

See Note 2 to the financial statements in Item 8 herein for a discussion of rate matters and certain cost recovery mechanisms. Also see "Integrated Resource Planning" herein for additional information.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power Company and certain of its generation subsidiaries are authorized by the FERC to sell power to non-affiliates, including short-term opportunity sales, at market-based prices. Specific FERC approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate.

Mississippi Power provides service under long-term contracts with rural electric cooperative associations and a municipality located in southeastern Mississippi which are subject to regulation by the FERC. The contracts with these wholesale customers represented 12.9% of Mississippi Power's total operating revenues in 2025.

Southern Company Gas' natural gas distribution utilities are subject to regulation and oversight by their respective state regulatory agencies. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class (residential, commercial, or industrial) and rate jurisdiction. These agencies approve rates designed to provide the opportunity to generate revenues to recover all prudently-incurred costs, including a return on rate base sufficient to pay interest on debt and provide a reasonable ROE.

With the exception of Atlanta Gas Light, the earnings of the natural gas distribution utilities can be affected by customer consumption patterns that are largely a function of price levels for natural gas and general economic conditions that may impact customers' ability to pay for natural gas consumed. The natural gas distribution utilities have weather or revenue normalization mechanisms that mitigate revenue fluctuations from customer consumption changes. Atlanta Gas Light operates in a deregulated environment in which Marketers rather than a traditional utility sell natural gas to end-use customers and earns revenue by charging rates to its customers based primarily on monthly fixed charges that are set by the Georgia PSC.

In addition to natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, other cost recovery mechanisms and regulatory riders, which vary by utility, allow recovery of certain costs, such as those related to infrastructure replacement programs as well as environmental remediation, energy efficiency plans, and bad debts.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Southern Company Gas" in Item 8 herein for a discussion of rate matters and certain cost recovery mechanisms.

Integrated Resource Planning

Each of the traditional electric operating companies continually evaluates its electric generating resources in order to ensure that it maintains a cost-effective and reliable mix of resources to meet the existing and future demand requirements of its customers. In addition, each year the Southern Company system engages in a scenario planning process, developing scenarios which look out over a 30-year horizon. For 2025, scenarios considered a range of views regarding pressure on CO 2 emissions, load growth, supply options, and fuel prices. Views regarding future pressure on CO 2 emissions include a fee beginning between $0 and $50 per metric ton rising above inflation over the 30-year planning period. See MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters" in Item 7 herein for a discussion of existing and potential environmental regulations that may impact the future generating resource needs of the traditional electric operating companies, as well as a discussion of the Southern Company system's continued generating fleet transition.

Triennially, Alabama Power provides an IRP report to the Alabama PSC. This report overviews Alabama Power's resource planning process and contains information that serves as the foundation for certain decisions affecting Alabama Power's portfolio of supply-side and demand-side resources. The IRP report facilitates Alabama Power's ability to provide reliable and cost-effective electric service to customers, while accounting for the risks and uncertainties inherent in planning for resources sufficient to meet expected customer demand. Under State of Alabama law, a CCN must be obtained from the Alabama PSC before Alabama Power constructs any new generating facility, unless such construction is an ordinary extension of an existing system in the usual course of business. Alabama Power provided its most recent IRP to the Alabama PSC during 2025. On August 13, 2025, the Alabama PSC approved a CCN authorizing Alabama Power to complete the acquisition of the Lindsay Hill Generating station. The transaction closed on September 30, 2025. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Alabama Power – Rate CNP New Plant" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

Triennially, Georgia Power must file an IRP with the Georgia PSC that specifies how it intends to meet the future electric service needs of its customers through a combination of demand-side and supply-side resources. The Georgia PSC, under state law, must certify any new demand-side or supply-side resources serving retail customers. Once certified, the lesser of actual or certified construction costs and purchased power costs is recoverable through rates. Georgia Power may request cost recovery for costs greater than those approved by the Georgia PSC if proven to be prudent and reasonable. Certified costs may be excluded from recovery only on the basis of fraud, concealment, failure to disclose a material fact, imprudence, or criminal misconduct. In April 2024, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's 2023 IRP Update as modified by a stipulation among Georgia Power, the staff of the Georgia PSC, and certain intervenors, which limited recovery of certain costs over the certified amount for Plant Yates Units 8, 9, and 10. On July 15, 2025, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's 2025 IRP, as modified by a stipulation among Georgia Power, the staff of the Georgia PSC, and certain intervenors.

On September 4, 2025, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request to certify a Georgia Power-owned battery energy storage facility with a capacity of 200 MWs and a projected COD in 2027. On December 19, 2025, the Georgia PSC approved Georgia Power's request, as modified by a stipulation between Georgia Power and the staff of the Georgia PSC, to certify resources totaling 9,885 MWs with projected CODs or delivery commencement dates between 2027 and 2030. As included in the 2022 IRP final order, on February 11, 2026, Georgia Power initiated an RFP for up to 500 MWs of capacity for battery energy storage facilities with projected CODs or delivery commencement dates by 2031.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Georgia Power – Integrated Resource Plans" and " – Rate Plans" in Item 8 herein for additional information.

Triennially, Mississippi Power must file an IRP with the Mississippi PSC, as well as an update at approximately the mid-point of the three-year cycle. The IRP must include long-term plans to best meet the needs of electric utility customers through a combination of demand-side and supply-side resources and considering transmission needs. The IRP filing is not intended to supplant or replace the Mississippi PSC's existing regulatory processes for petition and approval of CPCNs for new generating resources. In April 2024, Mississippi Power filed its 2024 IRP with the Mississippi PSC. The Mississippi PSC did not note any deficiencies within the prescribed 120-day review period; therefore, the filing was concluded. On January 9, 2025, Mississippi Power notified the Mississippi PSC of its intent to extend the retirement date of Plant Daniel Unit 2 and potentially extend the retirement dates of other fossil steam units beyond their current 2028 retirement dates in order to serve recently signed economic development loads of approximately 600 MWs. Mississippi Power has since acquired FP&L's 50% ownership interest in Plant Daniel Units 1 and 2. In 2026, Mississippi Power is expected to file an update to its 2024 IRP with the Mississippi PSC. Mississippi Power must also file an annual report on energy delivery improvements, the latest of which was filed in November 2025. See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Mississippi Power – Integrated Resource Plans" and " – Plant Daniel" in Item 8 herein for additional information.