Skip to main content

SOUTHERN CO

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Feb 15, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed Feb 15, 2024

SO$93.65+0.1%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Asset Retirement Obligations

  1. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred. The estimated costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of future removal activities. Each traditional electric operating company and natural gas distribution utility has received accounting guidance from its state PSC or applicable state regulatory agency allowing the continued accrual or recovery of other retirement costs for long-lived assets that it does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory liabilities and amounts to be recovered are reflected in the balance sheets as regulatory assets.

The ARO liabilities for the traditional electric operating companies primarily relate to facilities that are subject to the CCR Rule and the related state rules, principally ash ponds. In addition, Alabama Power and Georgia Power have retirement obligations related to the decommissioning of nuclear facilities (Alabama Power's Plant Farley and Georgia Power's ownership interests in Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 through 3). See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information. Other significant AROs include various landfill sites and asbestos removal for Alabama Power, Georgia Power, and Mississippi Power and gypsum cells and mine reclamation for Mississippi Power. The ARO liability for Southern Power primarily relates to its solar and wind facilities, which are located on long-term land leases requiring the restoration of land at the end of the lease.

The traditional electric operating companies and Southern Company Gas also have identified other retirement obligations, such as obligations related to certain electric transmission and distribution facilities, certain asbestos-containing material within long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, certain wireless communication towers, the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain transformers, leasehold improvements, equipment on customer property, and property associated with the Southern Company system's rail lines and natural gas pipelines. However, liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for certain retirement obligations related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these retirement obligations will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO.

Southern Company and the traditional electric operating companies will continue to recognize in their respective statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with regulatory treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability in the balance sheets as ordered by the various state PSCs.

Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:

Southern CompanyAlabama PowerGeorgia PowerMississippi PowerSouthern Power(*)
(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2021$11,687$4,334$6,824$190$131
Liabilities incurred36—35——
Liabilities settled(455)(205)(212)(20)—
Accretion expense40615823166
Cash flow revisions(834)—(844)37
Balance at December 31, 2022$10,840$4,287$6,034$179$144
Liabilities incurred90—90——
Liabilities settled(617)(270)(304)(18)—
Accretion expense40315623056
Cash flow revisions(399)(15)(385)2—
Balance at December 31, 2023$10,317$4,158$5,665$168$150

(*)Included in other deferred credits and liabilities on Southern Power's consolidated balance sheets.

II-171

In December 2022, Georgia Power recorded a net decrease of approximately $780 million to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule resulting from changes in estimates, including lower future inflation rates, higher discount rates, and timing of closure activities, as well as a change in closure methodology forone ash pond as approved in Georgia Power's 2022 IRP.

Following initial criticality for Plant Vogtle Unit 3 on March 6, 2023, Georgia Power recorded AROs of approximately $90 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, Plant Vogtle Unit 4 achieved initial criticality, which will result in Georgia Power recording AROs of approximately $118 million during the first quarter 2024. See Note 2 under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction" for additional information.

In September 2023 and November 2023, Georgia Power recorded net decreases of approximately $175 million and $210 million, respectively, to its AROs related to the CCR Rule and the related state rule resulting from changes in estimates, including lower future inflation rates and the timing of closure activities.

In June 2023, Alabama Power completed an updated decommissioning cost site study for Plant Farley. The estimated cost of decommissioning based on the study resulted in a decrease in Alabama Power's ARO liability of approximately $15 million. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information.

The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information at December 31, 2023 using various assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with the CCR Rule and the related state rules. The traditional electric operating companies have periodically updated, and expect to continue periodically updating, their related cost estimates and ARO liabilities for each CCR unit as additional information related to these assumptions becomes available. Some of these updates have been, and future updates may be, material. The cost estimates for Alabama Power are based on closure-in-place for all ash ponds. The cost estimates for Georgia Power and Mississippi Power are based on a combination of closure-in-place for some ash ponds and closure by removal for others. Additionally, the closure designs and plans in the States of Alabama and Georgia are subject to approval by environmental regulatory agencies. Absent continued recovery of ARO costs through regulated rates, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition for Southern Company and the traditional electric operating companies could be materially impacted. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "General Litigation Matters – Alabama Power" for additional information.

Nuclear Decommissioning

The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC's regulations. Use of the Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and state PSCs, as well as the IRS. While Alabama Power and Georgia Power are allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds' managers, neither Southern Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates are allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third-party managers with oversight by the management of Alabama Power and Georgia Power. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.

Alabama Power and Georgia Power record the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 13, as management believes that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.

II-172

Investment securities in the Funds for December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:

Southern CompanyAlabamaPowerGeorgiaPower
(in millions)
At December 31, 2023:
Equity securities$1,288$796$492
Debt securities895277618
Other securities23918653
Total investment securities in the Funds$2,422$1,259$1,163
At December 31, 2022:
Equity securities$1,095$690$405
Debt securities838267571
Other securities21016842
Total investment securities in the Funds(*)$2,143$1,125$1,018

(*)For Southern Company and Georgia Power, these amounts include investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to a securities lending program Georgia Power's Funds previously participated in through the managers of the Funds. Under this program, Georgia Power's Funds' investment securities were loaned to institutional investors for a fee. Securities loaned were fully collateralized by cash, letters of credit, and/or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities. At December 31, 2022, approximately $35 million of the fair market value of Georgia Power's Funds' securities were on loan and pledged to creditors under the Funds' managers' securities lending program. At December 31, 2022, the fair value of the collateral received was approximately $36 million and could only be sold by the borrower upon the return of the loaned securities. The collateral received was treated as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.

These amounts exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to pending investment purchases.

The fair value increases (decreases) of the Funds, including unrealized gains (losses) and reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' expenses, for 2023, 2022, and 2021 are shown in the table below.

Southern Company · AlabamaPower · GeorgiaPower
(in millions)
Fair value increases (decreases)
2023$281$157$124
2022(360)(171)(189)
202127420074
Unrealized gains (losses)
At December 31, 2023$241$119$122
At December 31, 2022(391)(204)(187)
At December 31, 2021(27)(30)3

The investment securities held in the Funds continue to be managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were acquired.

For Alabama Power, approximately $13 million and $14 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, previously recorded in internal reserves is being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama PSC.

The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. Alabama Power and Georgia Power have filed plans with the NRC designed to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the NRC.

II-173

At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the accumulated provisions for the external decommissioning trust funds were as follows:

20232022
(in millions)
Alabama Power
Plant Farley$1,259$1,125
Georgia Power
Plant Hatch$705$628
Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2434382
Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4248
Total$1,163$1,018

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a specific facility as of the site study year. The decommissioning cost estimates are based on removal of the plant from service and prompt dismantlement. The actual decommissioning costs may vary from these estimates because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates. The estimated costs of decommissioning at December 31, 2023 based on the most current studies were as follows:

Alabama Power · Georgia Power
PlantFarleyPlant Hatch(*)Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2(*)Plant Vogtle Unit 3(*)
Most current study year2023202120212020
Decommissioning periods:
Beginning year2037203420472063
Completion year2087207520792074
(in millions)
Site study costs:
Radiated structures$1,402$771$628$284
Spent fuel management51318617030
Non-radiated structures133618533
Total site study costs$2,048$1,018$883$347

(*)Based on Georgia Power's ownership interests.

For ratemaking purposes, Alabama Power's decommissioning costs are based on the site study and Georgia Power's decommissioning costs are based on the NRC generic estimate to decommission the radioactive portion of the facilities and the site study estimate for spent fuel management. Significant assumptions used to determine these costs for ratemaking were an estimated inflation rate of 4.5% for Plant Farley,2.5% for Plants Hatch and Vogtle Units 1 and 2, and 2.4% for Plant Vogtle Unit 3 and an estimated trust earnings rate of 7.0% for Plant Farley,4.5% for Plants Hatch and Vogtle Units 1 and 2, and 4.4% for Plant Vogtle Unit 3.

Amounts previously contributed to the Funds for Plant Farley are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. Alabama Power's site-specific estimates of decommissioning costs for Plant Farley are updated every five years. The next site study for Alabama Power is expected to be completed in 2028. Projections of funds are reviewed with the Alabama PSC to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide adequate funding to cover the site-specific costs. If necessary, Alabama Power would seek the Alabama PSC's approval to address any changes in a manner consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.

Under the 2019 ARP, Georgia Power's annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking in 2021 and 2022 was a total of $4 million for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. Effective January 1, 2023, as approved in the 2022 ARP, there isno annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking for Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle Units 1 and 2. Any funding amount required by the NRC during the period covered by the 2022 ARP will be deferred to a regulatory asset and recovery is expected to be determined in Georgia Power's next base rate case. See Note 2 under "Georgia Power – Rate Plans – 2022 ARP" for additional information. Effective August 1, 2023, as approved under the Plant Vogtle Unit 3 and Common Facilities rate proceeding, Georgia Power's

II-174 annual decommissioning cost for ratemaking is $8 million for Plant Vogtle Unit 3. See Note 2 under "Georgia Power – Nuclear Construction – Regulatory Matters" for additional information.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.