NEW YORK TIMES CO

9. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Pension Benefits

Single-Employer Plans

We maintain The New York Times Companies Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), a frozen single-employer defined benefit pension plan. The Company also jointly sponsors a defined benefit plan with The NewsGuild of New York (the “Guild”) known as the Guild-Times Adjustable Pension Plan (the “APP”) that continues to accrue active benefits.

We also have a foreign-based pension plan for certain employees (the “foreign plan”). The information for the foreign plan is combined with the information for U.S. non-qualified plans. The benefit obligation of the foreign plan is immaterial to our total benefit obligation.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY – P. 83

Net Periodic Pension Cost

The components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income were as follows:

Actuarial gains and losses are amortized using a corridor approach. The gain or loss corridor is equal to 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation and the market-related value of assets. Gains and losses in excess of the corridor are generally amortized over the future working lifetime for the ongoing plans and average life expectancy for the frozen plans.

We also contribute to defined contribution benefit plans. The amount of cost recognized for defined contribution benefit plans was approximately $51 million for 2025, $43 million for 2024 and $39 million for 2023, respectively.

P. 84 – THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets

The changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss were as follows:

Benefit obligations decreased from $1.19 billion at December 31, 2024, to $1.18 billion at December 31, 2025, primarily due to benefit payments of $133.2 million, partially offset by actuarial losses of $54.8 million driven by a decrease in the discount rate. Benefit payments include a lump sum offer, completed in the fourth quarter of 2025, extended to certain active employees. This completed lump sum offer did not result in a settlement charge.

Benefit obligations decreased from $1.25 billion at December 31, 2023, to $1.19 billion at December 31, 2024, primarily due to benefit payments of $90.8 million and actuarial gains of $33.7 million driven by an increase in the discount rate.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY – P. 85

The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans was $1.16 billion and $1.18 billion as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:

Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used in the actuarial computations to determine benefit obligations for qualified pension plans were as follows:

(1)3.04% for 2025 and 3.00% thereafter

The rate of increase in compensation levels is applicable only for the APP that has not been frozen.

Weighted-average assumptions used in the actuarial computations to determine net periodic pension cost for qualified plans were as follows:

(1)7.28% for 2024,3.04% for 2025 and 3.00% thereafter

Weighted-average assumptions used in the actuarial computations to determine benefit obligations for non-qualified plans were as follows:

The rate of increase in compensation levels is applicable only for the foreign plan that has not been frozen.

P. 86 – THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Weighted-average assumptions used in the actuarial computations to determine net periodic pension cost for non-qualified plans were as follows:

We determined our discount rate using a Ryan ALM, Inc. Curve (the “Ryan Curve”). The Ryan Curve provides the bonds included in the curve and allows adjustments for certain outliers (i.e., bonds on “watch”). We believe the Ryan Curve allows us to calculate an appropriate discount rate.

To determine our discount rate, we project a cash flow based on annual accrued benefits. The projected plan cash flow is discounted to the measurement date, which is the last day of our fiscal year, using the annual spot rates provided in the Ryan Curve.

In determining the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we evaluated input from our investment consultants, actuaries and investment management firms, including our review of asset class return expectations, as well as long-term historical asset class returns. Projected returns by such consultants and economists are based on broad equity and bond indices. Our objective is to select an average rate of earnings expected on existing plan assets and expected contributions to the plan during the year, less expense expected to be incurred by the plan during the year.

The market-related value of plan assets is multiplied by the expected long-term rate of return on assets to compute the expected return on plan assets, a component of net periodic pension cost. The market-related value of plan assets is a calculated value that recognizes changes in fair value over three years.

Plan Assets

The Pension Plan

The assets underlying the Pension Plan are managed by professional investment managers. These investment managers are selected and monitored by the pension investment committee, and composed of certain senior executives who are appointed by the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Finance Committee is responsible for adopting our investment policy, which includes rules regarding the selection and retention of qualified advisors and investment managers. The pension investment committee is responsible for implementing and monitoring compliance with our investment policy, selecting and monitoring investment managers and communicating the investment guidelines and performance objectives to the investment managers.

Our contributions are made on a basis determined by the actuaries in accordance with the funding requirements and limitations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code. There were no minimum funding requirements during the years ended December 31, 2025, or December 31, 2024.

Investment Policy and Strategy

The primary long-term investment objective is to allocate assets in a manner that produces a total rate of return that meets or exceeds the growth of our pension liabilities. An additional investment objective is to utilize the asset mix to hedge liabilities and minimize volatility in the funded status of the Pension Plan.

Asset Allocation Guidelines

In accordance with our asset allocation strategy, investments are categorized into liability-hedging assets whose value is highly correlated to that of the Pension Plan’s obligations (“Liability-Hedging Assets”) or other investments, such as equities and high-yield fixed income securities, whose return over time is expected to exceed the rate of growth in the Pension Plan’s obligations (“Return-Seeking Assets”).

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY – P. 87

The proportional allocation of assets between Liability-Hedging Assets and Return-Seeking Assets is dependent on the funded status of the Pension Plan. Under our policy, for example, a funded status at 102.5% requires an allocation of total assets of 85.5% to 90.5% to Liability-Hedging Assets and 9.5% to 14.5% to Return-Seeking Assets. As the Pension Plan’s funded status increases, the allocation to Liability-Hedging Assets will increase and the allocation to Return-Seeking Assets will decrease.

The following asset allocation guidelines apply to the Return-Seeking Assets as of December 31, 2025:

The asset allocations by asset category for both Liability-Hedging and Return-Seeking Assets, as of December 31, 2025, were as follows:

The specified target allocation of assets and ranges set forth above are maintained and reviewed on a periodic basis by the pension investment committee. The pension investment committee may direct the transfer of assets between investment managers in order to rebalance the portfolio in accordance with approved asset allocation ranges to accomplish the investment objectives for the Pension Plan’s assets.

The APP

The assets underlying the joint Company and The Guild sponsored plan are managed by professional investment managers. These investment managers are selected and monitored by the APP’s Board of Trustees (the “APP Trustees”). The APP Trustees are responsible for adopting an investment policy, implementing and monitoring compliance with that policy, selecting and monitoring investment managers, and communicating the investment guidelines and performance objectives to the investment managers.

Our contributions are made on a basis determined by the actuaries in accordance with the funding requirements and limitations of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code as well as the collective bargaining agreement with the Guild.

Investment Policy and Strategy

The investment objective is to allocate investment assets in a manner that satisfies the funding objectives of the APP and to maximize the probability of maintaining a 100% funded status.

Asset Allocation Guidelines

In accordance with the asset allocation guidelines, investments are segmented into hedging assets whose value is highly correlated to that of the APP’s obligations (“Hedging Assets”) or other investments, such as equities and high-yield fixed income securities, whose return over time is expected to exceed the rate of growth in the APP’s obligations (“Return-Seeking Assets”).

P. 88 – THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

The asset allocations by asset category as of December 31, 2025, were as follows:

The specified target allocation of assets and ranges set forth above are maintained and reviewed on a periodic basis by the APP Trustees. The APP Trustees may direct the transfer of assets between investment managers in order to rebalance the portfolio in accordance with approved asset allocation ranges to accomplish the investment objectives for the APP’s assets.

Fair Value of Plan Assets

The fair value of the assets underlying the Pension Plan and the joint-sponsored APP by asset category are as follows:

(1)The underlying assets of the common/collective funds primarily consist of equity and fixed income securities. The fair value in the above table represents our ownership share of the NAV of the underlying funds.

(2)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY – P. 89

(1)The underlying assets of the common/collective funds primarily consist of equity and fixed income securities. The fair value in the above table represents our ownership share of the NAV of the underlying funds.

(2)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Level 1 and Level 2 Investments

Where quoted prices are available in an active market for identical assets, such as equity securities traded on an exchange, transactions for the asset occur with such frequency that the pricing information is available on an ongoing/daily basis. We classify these types of investments as Level 1 where the fair value represents the closing/last trade price for these particular securities.

For our investments where pricing data may not be readily available, fair values are estimated by using quoted prices for similar assets, in both active and inactive markets, and observable inputs, other than quoted prices, such as interest rates and credit risk. We classify these types of investments as Level 2 because we are able to reasonably estimate the fair value through inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. There are no restrictions on our ability to sell any of our Level 1 and Level 2 investments.

Cash Flows

In 2025, we made contributions to the APP in the amount of $13.1 million. We expect contributions made to satisfy the greater of minimum funding or collective bargaining agreement requirements to total approximately $14 million in 2026.

P. 90 – THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

The following benefit payments, which reflect future service for plans that have not been frozen, are expected to be paid:

(1)While benefit payments under these plans are expected to continue beyond 2035, we have presented in this table only those benefit payments estimated over the next 10 years.

Multiemployer Plans

We contribute tothree multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of various collective bargaining agreements that cover our union-represented employees. Certain events, such as amendments to various collective bargaining agreements, the sale of the New England Media Group, a reduction in covered employees and the election by the Company to withdraw from certain plans, resulted in withdrawal liabilities due to multiemployer pension plans.

Our multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liability was approximately $60 million and $61 million as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. This liability represents the present value of the obligations related to complete and partial withdrawals that have already occurred.

The Company recorded a net $3.0 million charge, and net favorable adjustments of $3.0 million and $0.6 million, related to certain multiemployer pension plan liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively. These were recorded in Multiemployer pension plan liability adjustments in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The risks of participating in multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:

•Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.

•If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

•If we elect to withdraw from these plans or if we trigger a partial withdrawal due to declines in contribution base units or a partial cessation of our obligation to contribute, we may be assessed a withdrawal liability based on a calculated share of the underfunded status of the plan.

•If a multiemployer plan from which we have withdrawn subsequently experiences a mass withdrawal, we may be required to make additional contributions under applicable law.

Our participation in significant plans for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2025, is outlined in the table below. The “EIN/Pension Plan Number” column provides the Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) and the three-digit plan number. The zone status is based on the latest information we received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. A plan is generally classified in critical status if a funding deficiency is projected within four to five years, depending on other criteria. A plan in critical status is classified in critical and declining status if it is projected to become insolvent in the next 15 to 20 years, depending on other criteria.

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY – P. 91

A plan is classified in endangered status if its funded percentage is less than 80% or a funding deficiency is projected within seven years. If the plan satisfies both of these triggers, it is classified in seriously endangered status. A plan not classified in any other status is classified in the green zone. The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates plans for which a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented. The “Surcharge Imposed” column includes plans in a red zone status that are required to pay a surcharge in excess of regular contributions. The last column lists the expiration date(s) of the collective bargaining agreement(s) to which the plans are subject.

(1)There aretwo collective bargaining agreements requiring contributions to this plan: Mailers, which expires March 30, 2027, and Typographers, which expires March 30, 2030.

(2)Elections under the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010: Extended Amortization of Net Investment Losses (IRC Section 431(b)(8)(A)) and the Expanded Smoothing Period (IRC Section 431(b)(8)(B)).

(3)The plan terminated by mass withdrawal prior to the start of the 2023 plan year.

(4)The Company withdrew from the Pressmen’s Publishers’ Pension Fund and the Paper Handlers’ - Publishers’ Pension Fund during calendar year 2023.

(5)The Company withdrew from the GCIU-Employer Retirement Benefit Plan during calendar year 2024.

(6)The plan terminated by mass withdrawal prior to the start of the 2024 plan year.

The rehabilitation plan for the GCIU-Employer Retirement Benefit Plan includes minimum annual contributions no less than the total annual contribution made by us from September 1, 2008, through August 31, 2009.

The Company was listed in the plans’ respective Forms 5500 as providing more than 5% of the total contributions for the following plans and plan years:

(1)Form 5500 for the plan year ended 5/31/2025 was not available as of the date we filed our financial statements.

P. 92 – THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

Other Postretirement Benefits

We provide health benefits to certain primarily grandfathered retired employee groups (and their eligible dependents) who meet the definition of an eligible participant and certain age and service requirements, as outlined in the plan document. There is ade minimis liability for retiree health benefits for active employees. While we offer pre-age 65 retiree medical coverage to employees who meet certain retiree medical eligibility requirements, we do not provide post-age 65 retiree medical benefits for employees who retired on or after March 1, 2009. We accrue the costs of postretirement benefits during the employees’ active years of service and our policy is to pay our portion of insurance premiums and claims from general corporate assets.

These health benefit obligations decreased from $17.4 million at December 31, 2024, to $15.3 million at December 31, 2025, primarily due to benefit payments, net of participation contributions of $2.2 million.

In connection with collective bargaining agreements, we also contribute to several multiemployer welfare plans. These plans provide medical benefits to active and retired employees covered under the respective collective bargaining agreement. Contributions are made in accordance with the formula in the relevant agreement. Postretirement costs related to these plans are not reflected above and were approximately $22 million in 2025, $21 million in 2024 and $20 million in 2023.