FIFTH THIRD BANCORP
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 5, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 5, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Interest Rate and Price Risk Management
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
INTEREST RATE AND PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from movement of interest rates. This risk primarily impacts the Bancorp’s income categories through changes in interest income on earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and through fee items that are related to interest-sensitive activities such as mortgage origination and servicing income and through earnings credits earned on commercial deposits that offset commercial deposit fees. Price risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from changes in the value of financial instruments and portfolios due to movements in interest rates, volatilities, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. For more information, refer to the Interest Rate and Price Risk Management subsection of Risk Management section of MD&A of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
As of March 31, 2026, the Bancorp’s interest rate risk exposure is governed by a risk framework that utilizes the change in NII over 12-month and 24-month horizons under parallel and non-parallel increases and decreases in interest rates. Risk appetite thresholds are utilized for scenarios assuming a 200 bps increase and a 200 bps decrease in interest rates over 12-month and 24-month horizons. The Bancorp routinely analyzes various potential and extreme scenarios, including parallel ramps and shocks as well as non-parallel shifts in rates, to assess where risks to net interest income persist or develop as changes in the balance sheet and market rates evolve, and employs key risk indicators and early warning indicators to monitor and manage exposures under these types of scenarios. Additionally, the Bancorp routinely evaluates its exposures to changes in the basis between interest rates.
In order to recognize the risk of noninterest-bearing demand deposit balance migration or attrition in a rising interest rate environment, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling assumes additional attrition of approximately $1.8 billion of demand deposit balances over a period of 24 months for each 100 bps increase in short-term market interest rates. Similarly, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling incorporates approximately $1.8 billion of incremental growth in noninterest-bearing deposit balances over 24 months for each 100 bps decrease in short-term market interest rates. The incremental balance attrition and growth are modeled to flow into and out of funding products that reprice in conjunction with short-term market rate changes.
The Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling uses beta assumptions which result in weighted-average rising-rate interest-bearing deposit betas at the end of the ramped parallel scenarios of approximately 65%-70% for both a 100 bps and 200 bps increase in rates. In the event of continued rate cuts, this approach assumes a weighted-average falling-rate interest-bearing deposit beta at the end of the ramped parallel scenarios of approximately 55%-60% for both a 100 bps and 200 bps decrease in rates. In falling rate scenarios, deposit rate floors are utilized to ensure modeled deposit rates will not become negative. The Bancorp provides sensitivity analysis in Tables 52 and 53 for key assumptions related to its deposit modeling, including beta and demand deposit balance performance.
The Bancorp continually evaluates the sensitivity of its interest rate risk measures to these important deposit modeling assumptions. The Bancorp also regularly monitors the sensitivity of other important modeling assumptions, such as loan and security prepayments and early withdrawals on fixed-rate customer liabilities.
The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile and policy limits as of:
| TABLE 51: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile and Policy Limits | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 31, 2026 · March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| % Change in NII (FTE) · Policy Limit · % Change in NII (FTE) · Policy Limit | ||||||||
| Change in Interest Rates (bps) | 12 Months | 13-24Months | 12Months | 13-24Months | 12 Months | 13-24Months | 12Months | 13-24Months |
| +200 Ramp over 12 months | 0.60% | 2.77 | (9.00) | (15.00) | (3.54) | (4.84) | (6.00) | (7.00) |
| +100 Ramp over 12 months | 0.49 | 1.99 | NA | NA | (1.72) | (2.22) | NA | NA |
| -100 Ramp over 12 months | (1.30) | (4.30) | NA | NA | 0.84 | 0.69 | NA | NA |
| -200 Ramp over 12 months | (3.47) | (11.17) | (9.00) | (15.00) | 1.15 | (0.03) | (6.00) | (7.00) |
Table 51 presents the change in estimated net interest income for 12 month and 13-24 month horizons for alternative interest rate scenarios relative to the net interest income projection for a static rate scenario for those same time horizons. These numbers do not represent a forecast, but are instead risk measures that are monitored to evaluate the consolidated interest rate risk position of the Bancorp. At March 31, 2026, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity in the rising-rate scenarios is positive in years one and two as interest income is expected to increase more than interest expense primarily due to floating-rate loans repricing faster than interest-bearing deposits. The Bancorp’s NII simulation projects a decrease in NII in year one under both the parallel 100 bps ramp decrease and 200 bps ramp decrease in interest rates driven by an expectation that deposits would reprice slower than earning assets. In year two of these simulations, some deposits have reached their floors, but assets continue to be repriced to lower rates, generating less NII. The changes in the estimated NII sensitivity profile compared to March 31, 2025 were attributable to growth in floating-rate loans and noninterest-bearing deposits primarily due to the Comerica acquisition.
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Tables 52 and 53 provide the sensitivity of the Bancorp’s estimated NII profile at March 31, 2026 to changes to certain deposit balance and deposit repricing sensitivity (beta) assumptions.
The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile with an immediate $1 billion decrease and an immediate $1 billion increase in demand deposit balances as of March 31, 2026:
| TABLE 52: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at March 31, 2026 with a $1 Billion Change in Demand Deposit Assumption | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change in NII (FTE) | ||||
| Immediate $1 Billion BalanceDecrease · Immediate $1 Billion BalanceIncrease | ||||
| Change in Interest Rates (bps) | 12 Months | 13-24Months | 12Months | 13-24Months |
| +200 Ramp over 12 months | 0.08% | 2.19 | 1.11 | 3.36 |
| +100 Ramp over 12 months | 0.03 | 1.51 | 0.95 | 2.47 |
| -100 Ramp over 12 months | (1.64) | (4.57) | (0.96) | (4.03) |
| -200 Ramp over 12 months | (3.75) | (11.33) | (3.18) | (11.00) |
The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile with a 5% increase and a 5% decrease to the corresponding deposit beta assumptions as of March 31, 2026:
| TABLE 53: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at March 31, 2026 with Deposit Beta Assumptions Changes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change in NII (FTE) | ||||
| Betas 5% Higher(a) · Betas 5% Lower(a) | ||||
| Change in Interest Rates (bps) | 12 Months | 13-24Months | 12Months | 13-24Months |
| +200 Ramp over 12 months | (0.21)% | 1.28 | 1.49 | 4.49 |
| +100 Ramp over 12 months | 0.08 | 1.23 | 0.94 | 2.84 |
| -100 Ramp over 12 months | (0.94) | (3.62) | (1.69) | (5.05) |
| -200 Ramp over 12 months | (2.76) | (9.87) | (4.24) | (12.60) |
(a)Applies a +/- 5% addition on assumed betas.
Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity
The Bancorp also uses EVE as a measurement tool to govern and manage its interest rate risk exposure. The exposure is governed by a risk framework that uses risk appetite thresholds for scenarios assuming an instantaneous 200 bps increase and a 200 bps decrease in interest rates. The Bancorp routinely analyzes exposures to other interest rate scenarios and employs key risk indicators to monitor and manage exposures.
The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated EVE sensitivity profile as of:
| TABLE 54: Estimated EVE Sensitivity Profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 31, 2026 | March 31, 2025 | |||
| Change in Interest Rates (bps) | % Change in EVE | Policy Limit | % Change in EVE | Policy Limit |
| +200 Shock | (1.22)% | (12.00) | (5.92) | (12.00) |
| +100 Shock | (0.26) | N/A | (2.50) | N/A |
| -100 Shock | (1.13) | N/A | 1.05 | N/A |
| -200 Shock | (4.31) | (12.00) | (0.11) | (12.00) |
The EVE sensitivity is negative in both a +200 bps and +100 bps rising-rate scenario as well as both a -100 bps and -200 bps falling-rate scenario at March 31, 2026. The changes in the estimated EVE sensitivity profile from March 31, 2025 were primarily related to changes in forward interest rate expectations, an increase in interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits reflecting the impact of the Comerica acquisition, partially offset by growth in the investment securities portfolio.
While an instantaneous shift in spot interest rates is used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure, the Bancorp believes that a gradual shift in interest rates would have a more modest impact. Since EVE measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the estimated lives of instruments, the change in EVE does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over a shorter time horizon (e.g., the current fiscal year). Further, EVE does not account for factors such as future balance sheet growth, changes in product mix, changes in yield curve relationships and changing product spreads that could mitigate or exacerbate the impact of changes in interest
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
rates. The NII simulations and EVE analyses do not necessarily include certain actions that management may undertake to manage risk in response to actual changes in interest rates.
The Bancorp regularly evaluates its exposures to a static balance sheet forecast, basis risks relative to the Prime Rate and various SOFR terms, yield curve twist risks and embedded options risks. In addition, the impacts on NII on an FTE basis and EVE of extreme changes in interest rates are modeled, wherein the Bancorp employs the use of yield curve shocks and environment-specific scenarios.
Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk
An integral component of the Bancorp’s interest rate risk management strategy is its use of derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in market interest rates. Examples of derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps, forward contracts, forward starting interest rate swaps, options, swaptions and TBA securities.
These positions are used to convert the contractual interest rate index of agreed-upon amounts of assets and liabilities (i.e., notional amounts) to another interest rate index, to hedge the exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate or to hedge forecasted transactions for the variability in cash flows attributable to the contractually specified interest rate. The volume, maturity and mix of portfolio swaps change frequently as the Bancorp adjusts its broader interest rate risk management objectives and the balance sheet positions to be hedged.
Additionally, as part of its overall risk management strategy relative to its residential mortgage banking activities, the Bancorp enters into forward contracts accounted for as free-standing derivatives to economically hedge IRLCs that are also considered free-standing derivatives. The Bancorp economically hedges its exposure to residential mortgage loans held for sale through the use of forward contracts and mortgage options as well.
The Bancorp also enters into derivative contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge market risks assumed in interest rate derivative contracts with commercial customers. Generally, these contracts have similar terms in order to protect the Bancorp from market volatility. Credit risk arises from the possible inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts, which the Bancorp minimizes through collateral arrangements, approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. The Bancorp has risk limits and internal controls in place to help ensure excessive risk is not being taken in providing this service to customers. These controls include an independent determination of interest rate volatility and potential future exposure on these contracts and counterparty credit approvals performed by independent risk management.
For further information, including the notional amount and fair values of these derivatives, refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, for information on residential mortgage servicing rights and price risk, foreign currency risk, and commodity risk, refer to the Interest Rate and Price Risk Management subsection of Risk Management section of MD&A of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.