Skip to main content

COUSINS PROPERTIES INC

For the period ended Jun 30, 2024. Filed Jul 25, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Jun 30, 2024 · Filed Jul 25, 2024

CUZ$30.12+1.8%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risk factors that affect our business and financial results are discussed in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors," of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those previously disclosed in our Annual Report, except for the additional risk factors below. You should carefully consider the risks described below in conjunction with those risks disclosed in our Annual Report, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results. These risks are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations could be negatively affected.

Adverse changes to our credit ratings could limit our access to funding and increase our borrowing costs.

Credit ratings are subject to ongoing review by rating agencies, which consider a number of factors, including our financial strength, performance, prospects and operations as well as factors not under our control. Other factors that influence our credit ratings include changes to the rating agencies' methodologies for our industry or certain security types; the rating agencies' assessment of the general operating environment for financial services companies; our relative positions in the markets in which we compete; our various risk exposures and risk management policies and activities; pending litigation and other contingencies; our reputation; our liquidity position, diversity of funding sources and funding costs; the current and expected level and volatility of our earnings; our capital position and capital management practices; our corporate governance; current or future regulatory and legislative initiatives; and the agencies' views on whether the U.S. government would provide meaningful support to us or our subsidiaries in a crisis. Rating agencies could make adjustments to our credit ratings at any time, and there can be no assurance that they will maintain our ratings at current levels or that downgrades will not occur.

Any downgrade in our credit ratings could potentially adversely affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to borrow or obtain funding, increase our cost of capital and/or limit our access to capital markets. In particular, interest rate spreads on some of our corporate floating rate debt are based on our current corporate credit ratings. If these ratings were to decrease, the Company would see an increase in the interest expense related to these loans, which could have a material impact to earnings.

Credit rating downgrades or negative watch warnings could negatively impact our reputation with lenders, investors and other third parties, which could also impair our ability to compete in certain markets or engage in certain transactions. In particular, holders of securities or debt instruments may perceive such a downgrade or warning negatively and pursue divestment of all or a portion of such securities or debt instruments. While certain aspects of a credit rating downgrade are quantifiable, the impact that such a downgrade would have on our liquidity, business and results of operations in future periods is inherently uncertain and would depend on a number of interrelated factors, including, among other things, the magnitude of the downgrade, the rating relative to peers, the rating assigned by the relevant agency pre-downgrade, individual client behavior and future mitigating actions we might take.

Our investments in real estate debt face prepayment risk and interest rate fluctuations that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

During periods of declining interest rates, a borrower under a loan may exercise its option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing the Company to reinvest the proceeds from such prepayment into potentially lower yielding securities or loans, which may result in a decline in return. Debt investments frequently have call features that allow the borrower to prepay the loan at dates prior to its stated maturity at a specified price (typically greater than par) only if certain prescribed conditions are met. An issuer or borrower may choose to prepay a loan if, for example, the issuer or borrower can refinance the debt at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer or borrower. In addition, the market price of the investments will change in response to changes in interest rates and other factors. The magnitude of these fluctuations in the market price of debt investments is generally greater for loans with longer maturities. These changes could have an impact on the value of our investments and have a material impact on earnings as these investments are carried at fair value.

We will face risks related to our investments in mezzanine loans.

Our mezzanine loans are secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity or entities that own(s) the property. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. Repayment of a mezzanine loan is dependent on the successful operation of the underlying commercial properties, and therefore mezzanine loans are subject to similar considerations and risks as our investments in operating real estate. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan or, as the mezzanine loans are generally non-recourse to the borrowers, there is a risk that at foreclosure the value of the ownership interest in the entity is less than the carrying value of the investment resulting in a charge from the decrease in carrying value of our investment. Additionally, in the event of a foreclosure of the pledged interests, there may not be a robust market of willing purchasers to acquire interests in an entity that would be willing to undertake the cure of senior mortgages necessary to prevent real property foreclosures. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. Thus, while there may be sufficient revenue from the property to service the mortgage loan, those revenues may be exhausted before the mezzanine loan is serviced. The same would be true for casualty situations. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.