Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Catastrophic weather events or other disasters could result in an interruption of our operations, a delay in the construction of our Liquefaction Projects, damage to our Liquefaction Projects and increased insurance costs, all of which could adversely affect us.

Weather events such as major hurricanes and winter storms have caused interruptions or temporary suspension in construction or operations at our facilities or caused minor damage to our facilities. Our risk of loss related to weather events or other disasters is limited by contractual provisions in our SPAs, which can provide under certain circumstances relief from operational events, and partially mitigated by insurance we maintain. Aggregate direct and indirect losses associated with the aforementioned weather events, net of insurance reimbursements, have not historically been material to our Consolidated Financial Statements, and we believe our insurance coverages maintained, existence of certain protective clauses within our SPAs and other risk management strategies mitigate our exposure to material losses. However, future adverse weather events and collateral effects, or other disasters such as explosions, fires, floods or severe droughts, could cause damage to, or interruption of operations at our terminals or related infrastructure, or interruptions to our power supply, which could impact our operating results, increase insurance premiums or deductibles paid and delay or increase costs associated with the construction and development of our Liquefaction Projects or our other facilities. Our LNG terminal infrastructure and LNG facilities are designed in accordance with the requirements of 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 193, Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards, and all applicable industry codes and standards.

Disruptions to the third party supply of natural gas to our pipelines and facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We depend upon third party pipelines and other facilities that provide gas delivery options to our liquefaction facilities and pipelines. If any pipeline connection were to become unavailable for current or future volumes of natural gas due to repairs, damage to the facility, lack of capacity, failure to replace contracted firm pipeline transportation capacity on economic terms, or any other reason, our ability to receive natural gas volumes to produce LNG or for transporters to continue shipping natural gas to us from producing regions or to end markets could be adversely impacted. Such disruptions to our third party supply of natural gas may also be caused by weather events or other disasters described in the immediately preceding risk factor. While certain contractual provisions in our SPAs can limit the potential impact of disruptions, and historical indirect losses incurred by us as a result of disruptions to our third party supply of natural gas have not been material, any significant disruption to our natural gas supply where we may not be protected could result in a substantial reduction in our revenues under our long-term SPAs or other customer arrangements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We may not be able to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient natural gas to satisfy our delivery obligations under the SPAs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Under the SPAs with our customers, we are required to make available to them a specified amount of LNG at specified times. The supply of natural gas to our Liquefaction Projects to meet our LNG production requirements timely and at sufficient quantities is critical to our operations and the fulfillment of our customer contracts. However, we may not be able to purchase or receive physical delivery of natural gas as a result of various factors, including non-delivery or untimely delivery by our suppliers, depletion of natural gas reserves within regional basins and disruptions to pipeline operations as described in the immediately preceding risk factor. Additionally, composition changes in the quality of feed gas received from third parties may impact operational efficiency and performance, which could have an effect on our operating results. Our risk is in part mitigated by the diversification of our natural gas supply and transportation across suppliers and pipelines, and regionally across basins, and additionally, we have provisions within our supplier contracts that provide certain protections against non-performance. Further, provisions within our SPAs provide certain protection against force majeure events. While historically we have not incurred significant or prolonged disruptions to our natural gas supply that have resulted in a material adverse impact to our operations, due to the criticality of natural gas supply to our production of LNG, our failure to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient quantities of natural gas under circumstances where we may not be protected could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We are subject to significant construction and operating hazards and uninsured risks, one or more of which may create significant liabilities and losses for us.

The construction and operation of our LNG terminals and our pipelines are, and will be, subject to the inherent risks associated with these types of operations as discussed throughout our risk factors, including explosions, breakdowns or failures of equipment, operational errors by vessel or tug operators, pollution, release of toxic substances, fires, hurricanes and adverse weather conditions and other hazards, each of which could result in significant delays in commencement or interruptions of operations and/or in damage to or destruction of our facilities or damage to persons and property. In addition, our operations and the facilities and vessels of third parties on which our operations are dependent face possible risks associated with acts of aggression or terrorism.

We do not, nor do we intend to, maintain insurance against all of these risks and losses. We may not be able to maintain desired or required insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable. Although losses incurred as a result of self-insured risk have not been material historically, the occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We are dependent on our EPC partners and other contractors for the successful completion of the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and any potential expansion projects, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project.

Timely and cost-effective completion of the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and any potential expansion projects, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, in compliance with agreed specifications is central to our business strategy and is highly dependent on the performance of our EPC partners, including Bechtel, and our other contractors under their agreements. The ability of our EPC partners and our other contractors to perform successfully under their agreements is dependent on a number of factors, including their ability to:

•design and engineer each Train to operate in accordance with specifications;

•engage and retain third party subcontractors and procure equipment and supplies;

•respond to difficulties such as equipment failure, delivery delays, schedule changes and failure to perform by subcontractors, some of which are beyond their control;

•attract, develop and retain skilled personnel, including engineers;

•post required construction bonds and comply with the terms thereof;

•manage the construction process generally, including coordinating with other contractors and regulatory agencies; and

•maintain their own financial condition, including adequate working capital.

Although some agreements may provide for liquidated damages if the contractor fails to perform in the manner required with respect to certain of its obligations, the events that trigger a requirement to pay liquidated damages may delay or impair the operation of the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and any potential expansion projects, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, and any liquidated damages that we receive may not be sufficient to cover the damages that we suffer as a result of any such delay or impairment. The obligations of EPC partners and our other contractors to pay liquidated damages under their agreements are subject to caps on liability, as set forth therein.

Furthermore, we may have disagreements with our contractors about different elements of the construction process, which could lead to the assertion of rights and remedies under their contracts and increase the cost of the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and any potential expansion projects, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, or result in a contractor’s unwillingness to perform further work. If any contractor is unable or unwilling to perform according to the negotiated terms and timetable of its respective agreement for any reason or terminates its agreement, we would be required to engage a substitute contractor. This would likely result in significant project delays and increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Cost overruns and delays in the construction of our expansion projects, including the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project, the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, as well as difficulties in obtaining sufficient financing to pay for such costs and delays, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Our investment decision on the Corpus Christi Stage 3 Project, the CCL Midscale Trains 8 & 9 Project and any potential future expansion of LNG facilities, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, relies on cost estimates developed initially through front end engineering and design studies. However, due to the size and duration of construction of an LNG facility, the actual construction costs may be significantly higher than our current estimates as a result of many factors, including but not limited to changes in scope and the ability of Bechtel and our other contractors to execute successfully under their agreements. Although our major EPC contracts are fixed price, as construction progresses, we may decide or be forced to submit change orders to our contractor, including change orders to comply with existing or future environmental or other regulations. Any change orders could result in longer construction periods, higher construction costs, including increased commodity prices (particularly nickel and steel) and escalating labor costs, or both. Additionally, certain of our SPAs provide that the customer may terminate that SPA if the relevant Train does not timely commence commercial operations. As a result, any significant construction delay, whatever the cause, could have a material adverse impact on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Significant increases in the cost of a liquefaction project or significant construction delays could impact the commercial viability of the project as well as require us to obtain additional sources of financing to fund our operations until the applicable liquefaction project is fully constructed (which could cause further delays), thereby negatively impacting our business and limiting our growth prospects. While historically we have not experienced cost overruns or construction delays that have had a significant adverse impact on our operations, factors giving rise to such events in the future may be outside of our control and could have a material adverse effect on our current or future business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Our ability to complete development and/or construction of additional Trains, including the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project, will be contingent on our ability to obtain additional funding. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funding, we may be unable to fully execute our growth strategy.

We continuously pursue liquefaction expansion opportunities and other projects along the LNG value chain. As described further in Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties, we are currently developing the SPL Expansion Project and the CCL Expansion Project. The commercial development of an LNG facility takes a number of years and requires a substantial capital investment that is dependent on sufficient funding and commercial interest, among other factors.

We will require significant additional funding to be able to commence construction of the SPL Expansion Project, the CCL Expansion Project and any additional expansion projects, which we may not be able to obtain at a cost that results in positive economics, or at all. The inability to achieve acceptable funding may cause a delay in the development or construction of the SPL Expansion Project, the CCL Expansion Project or any additional expansion projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy, financial condition, operating results, cash flow and liquidity.

There may be impediments to the transport of LNG to customers, such as shortages of LNG vessels worldwide or operational impacts on LNG shipping, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We sell a significant amount of our LNG under DAP terms requiring delivery to international destinations. To fulfill our transportation requirements under these arrangements, including those under long term SPAs, we depend on the ability to secure chartered vessels often through long term lease arrangements. The construction and delivery of LNG vessels require significant capital and long construction lead times, and we may execute charters several years before the lease arrangements commence.

Although we actively manage our vessel requirements in response to the market and our customer contracts, the availability of LNG vessels and transportation costs could be impacted to the detriment of our business and our customers because of:

•an inadequate number of shipyards constructing LNG vessels and a backlog of orders at these shipyards;

•shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials;

•political or economic disturbances;

•acts of war or piracy;

•changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organizations’ regulations;

•work stoppages or other labor disturbances;

•bankruptcy or other financial crisis of shipbuilders or shipowners;

•quality or engineering problems;

•disruptions to maritime transportation routes, such as the security situation in the Gulf of Aden and congestion at the Panama Canal; and

•weather interference or a catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake, tsunami or fire.

While our chartered vessels are operated by the ship owners and we are exposed to risks outside of our own control, we are generally protected through provisions in our charter agreements from transportation disruptions on the part of the ship owner, including disruptions due to off-hire and downtime periods or shipping delays. However, other events outside of our control where we may not be protected may have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Additionally, while our vessel charters allow us to secure fixed rates under long term contracts (in certain cases subject to inflation) and we generally structure our SPAs to recover increase in such costs, our profitability, particularly relating to our short term or spot LNG sales outside of our SPAs, is largely dependent on the strength of international LNG markets. While historical downturns have not had a material adverse impact to our operations or results, any prolonged weakening of such markets could result in depressed or negative margins. See the risk factor Cyclical or other changes in the demand for and price of LNG and natural gas may adversely affect our LNG business and the performance of our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects for additional discussion.

Changes to U.S. trade policy could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

The U.S. has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs and trade restrictions. Additionally, President Trump has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. For example, as part of its Section 301 investigation of the maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sector in China (the“Section 301 Investigation”), the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (the“USTR”) in April 2025 mandated, among other things, restrictions on maritime transport services for U.S. LNG exports. These measures require that, beginning in April 2029, 1% of U.S. LNG exports must be exported on U.S.-built vessels, with such percentage gradually increasing to 15% in April 2047, with certain exceptions. In its original April 2025 notice, USTR had included the potential suspension of LNG export licenses as a remedy for non-compliance with the U.S. vessel restrictions; however, USTR subsequently removed the suspension language. In November 2025, the White House announced that, as part of the broader economic and trade relations deal with China, it had agreed to defer certain pending tariff and trade measures against China, including suspending for one year the implementation of fees on China-linked vessels pursuant to the Section 301 Investigation. However, the timeline for the U.S.-built vessel requirements for U.S. LNG exports thus far has not been modified. Given the ongoing evolution of the Section 301 Investigation measures, the potential impact of the restrictions on us and the LNG industry remains uncertain.

There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries with respect to trade policies, trade agreements, trade restrictions and tariffs. Any resulting unwillingness or inability of LNG purchasers in such countries to import LNG from the U.S. or increases in pricing as a result of retaliatory tariffs on exported U.S. LNG, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Cyclical or other changes in the demand for and price of LNG and natural gas may adversely affect our LNG business and the performance of our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Our LNG business and the development of domestic LNG facilities and projects generally is based on assumptions about the future availability and price of natural gas and LNG and the prospects for international natural gas and LNG markets. Natural gas and LNG prices have been, and are likely to continue to be, volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to one or more of the following factors:

•increasingly competitive North American LNG landscape;

•insufficient or oversupply of natural gas liquefaction or receiving capacity worldwide;

•insufficient LNG tanker capacity;

•weather conditions, including temperature volatility resulting from climate change, and extreme weather events may lead to unexpected distortion in the balance of international LNG supply and demand;

•reduced demand and lower prices for natural gas worldwide;

•increased demand for natural gas in North America;

•increased natural gas production worldwide, either domestically or deliverable by pipelines, which could suppress demand for LNG;

•decreased oil and natural gas exploration activities which may decrease the production of natural gas in North America;

•cost improvements that allow competitors to provide natural gas liquefaction capabilities at reduced prices;

•changes in supplies of, and prices for, alternative energy sources which may reduce the demand for natural gas;

•changes in regulatory, tax or other governmental policies regarding exported North American LNG, natural gas or alternative energy sources, which may reduce the demand for exported North American LNG and/or natural gas;

•political conditions in customer regions;

•sudden decreases in demand for LNG as a result of natural disasters or public health crises, including the occurrence of a pandemic, and other catastrophic events;

•adverse relative demand for North American LNG compared to other sources, which may decrease LNG exports from North America; and

•cyclical trends in general business and economic conditions that cause changes in the demand for natural gas.

Adverse trends or developments affecting any of these factors could result in decreases in the price of LNG and/or natural gas, which could materially and adversely affect our LNG business and the performance of our customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Failure of exported LNG to be a long term competitive source of energy for international markets could adversely affect our customers and could materially and adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Operations of the Liquefaction Projects are dependent upon the ability of our SPA customers to deliver LNG supplies from North America, which is primarily dependent upon LNG being a competitive source of energy internationally. The success of our business plan is dependent, in part, on the extent to which LNG can, for significant periods and in significant volumes, be supplied from North America and delivered to international markets at a lower cost than the cost of alternative energy sources. Through the use of improved exploration technologies, additional sources of natural gas may be discovered outside North America, which could increase the available supply of natural gas outside North America and could result in natural gas in those markets being available at a lower cost than LNG exported to those markets.

Political instability in foreign countries that import or export natural gas, or strained relations between such countries and the U.S., may also impede the willingness or ability of LNG purchasers or suppliers and merchants in such countries to import LNG from the U.S. Furthermore, some foreign purchasers or suppliers of LNG may have economic or other reasons to obtain their LNG from, or direct their LNG to, non-U.S. markets or from or to our competitors’ liquefaction facilities in the U.S.

As described in Market Factors and Competition in Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties, it is expected that global demand for natural gas and LNG will continue to increase as nations seek more abundant, reliable and environmentally cleaner fuel alternatives to fossil fuel energy sources such as oil and coal. However, as a result of transitions globally from fossil-based systems of energy production and consumption to renewable energy sources, LNG may face increased competition from alternative, cleaner sources of energy as such alternative sources emerge. Additionally, LNG from the Liquefaction Projects also competes with other sources of LNG, including LNG that is priced to indices other than Henry Hub. Some of these sources of energy may be available at a lower cost than LNG from the Liquefaction Projects in certain markets. The cost of LNG supplies from North America, including the Liquefaction Projects, may also be impacted by an increase in natural gas prices in North America.

As described in General in Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties, as of December 31, 2025, we have contracted through our SPAs and IPM agreements approximately 90% of the total anticipated production from the Liquefaction Projects through the mid-2030s, excluding volumes from contracts with terms less than 10 years and volumes from SPAs that are conditional on additional liquefaction capacity beyond what is currently in construction or operation, subject to unilateral waiver by us. However, as a result of the factors described above and other factors, the LNG we produce may not remain a long term competitive source of energy internationally, particularly when our existing long term contracts begin to expire. Any significant impediment to the ability to continue to secure long term commercial contracts or deliver LNG from the U.S. could have a material adverse effect on our customers and on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We face competition based upon the international market price for LNG.

Our Liquefaction Projects are subject to the risk of LNG price competition at times when we need to replace any existing SPA, whether due to natural expiration, default or otherwise, or enter into new SPAs. Factors relating to competition may prevent us from entering into a new or replacement SPA on economically comparable terms as existing SPAs, or at all. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects. Factors which may negatively affect potential demand for LNG from our Liquefaction Projects are diverse and include, among others:

•increases in worldwide LNG production capacity and availability of LNG for market supply;

•decreases in demand for LNG or increases in demand for LNG but at levels below those required to maintain current price equilibrium with respect to supply;

•increases in the cost to supply natural gas feedstock to our Liquefaction Projects;

•increases in the cost to supply power to our Liquefaction Projects;

•decreases in the cost of competing sources of natural gas or alternate fuels such as coal, heavy fuel oil and diesel;

•decreases in the price of non-U.S. LNG, including decreases in price as a result of contracts indexed to lower oil prices;

•increases in capacity and utilization of nuclear power and related facilities; and

•displacement of LNG by pipeline natural gas or alternate fuels in locations where access to these energy sources is not currently available.

A cyberattack involving our business, operational control systems or related infrastructure, or that of third parties with whom we do business, including pipelines which supply our Liquefaction Projects, or an attack on our critical suppliers, could negatively impact our business or operations, result in data security breaches, impede the processing of transactions, delay financial or compliance reporting and potentially harm our reputation.

The pipeline and LNG industries are increasingly dependent on business and operational control technologies to conduct daily operations. We rely on control systems, technologies and networks to run our business and to control and manage our trading, marketing, pipeline, liquefaction and shipping operations. Cyberattacks on businesses have escalated in recent years, including as a result of geopolitical tensions, and use of the internet, cloud services, mobile communication systems and other public networks exposes our business and that of other third parties with whom we do business to potential cyberattacks, including third party pipelines which supply natural gas to our Liquefaction Projects. For example, in 2021 Colonial Pipeline suffered a ransomware attack that led to the complete shutdown of its pipeline system for six days. Should multiple of the third party pipelines which supply our Liquefaction Projects suffer similar concurrent attacks, our Liquefaction Projects may not be able to obtain sufficient natural gas to operate at full capacity, or at all. A cyberattack involving our business or operational control systems or related infrastructure, or that of third parties pipelines with whom we do business, or an attack on our critical suppliers, could negatively impact our business or operations, result in data security breaches, impede the processing of transactions, delay financial or compliance reporting and potentially harm our reputation.

We may experience increased labor costs, and the unavailability of skilled workers or our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect us. In addition, changes in our senior management or other key personnel could affect our business results.

We are dependent upon the available labor pool of skilled employees. We compete with other energy companies and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to construct and operate our facilities and pipelines and to provide our customers with the highest quality service. In the U.S., we are also subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum wage, overtime and other working conditions. A shortage in the labor pool of skilled workers, remoteness of our site locations, general inflationary pressures, changes in applicable laws and regulations or labor disputes could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel and could require an increase in the wage and benefits packages that we offer, thereby increasing our operating costs. In addition, we are also subject to increased competition for skilled workers from new entrants to the LNG market. Any increase in our operating costs could materially and adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

We depend on our executive officers for various activities. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our personnel. Although we have arrangements relating to compensation and benefits with certain of our executive officers, we do not have any employment contracts or other agreements with key personnel binding them to provide services for any particular term, other than our employment agreement with our President and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, at one or more of our facilities could adversely affect our operations or business.

Our facilities at the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal and Corpus Christi LNG Terminal are critical infrastructure and continued to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic through our implementation of workplace controls and pandemic risk reduction measures. While the COVID-19 pandemic, including subsequent variants, had no adverse impact on our on-going operations, the risk of future variants and other infectious diseases is unknown and the outbreak of a more potent variant or another infectious disease in the future at one or more of our facilities could adversely affect our operations or business.